Technical implementation of ETHRAEON governance framework
What Are Constitutional Rules?
Constitutional Rules are machine-readable governance constraints that enforce human authority over AI systems within the ETHRAEON framework. They are NOT suggestions or guidelines—they are architectural law, embedded in system code and enforced at runtime.
Governing Principle:
NO AI SYSTEM MAY MAKE DECISIONS WITHOUT EXPLICIT HUMAN AUTHORIZATION
This is implemented through deterministic rule evaluation, evidence chain requirements, and explicit authority boundaries for every system and interface.
Core Principles
1. Human Authority Is Absolute
All AI operations require pre-authorization by AC-1 (Jason Prohaska)
No system may delegate, simulate, or assume authority
Override mechanisms available at all times
Emergency halt capability mandatory
2. Evidence Chain Mandatory
Every action logged to Canon evidence registry
Cryptographic verification of all transactions
No black-box operations permitted
Audit trails immutable and timestamped
3. Deterministic Execution
No probabilistic decision-making
No emergent behavior or "learning" in production
Rule evaluation must be reproducible
Same inputs → Same outputs (always)
4. Authority Boundaries Explicit
Each system has defined CAN/CANNOT lists
Boundary violations trigger immediate halt
No operating beyond pre-authorized scope
Fail-safe by design
How Rules Are Applied
Rule Engine Architecture
ETHRAEON systems use a constitutional rule engine that:
Parses Request: Incoming request checked against authorization registry
Evaluates Boundary: Request scope validated against system authority limits
Checks Evidence: Validates request has evidence chain or creates new chain
Executes Operation: Only if all constraints satisfied
Logs to Canon: Records operation with cryptographic proof
Returns Result: Response includes evidence reference and validation proof
Example: Fraud Detection Interface
When a user submits a transaction for fraud analysis: