Demonstration interfaces operating under constitutional governance constraints
What are Interfaces?
Interfaces demonstrate ETHRAEON capabilities within strict governance constraints. They do NOT make autonomous decisions, simulate authority, or operate without human oversight. All outputs are subject to human review. Evidence chains are mandatory. Constitutional rules apply absolutely.
Key Principle: These are demonstrations of how AI systems should operate under human authority—not autonomous agents, not "intelligent assistants" making decisions, not black-box systems claiming emergent behavior.
Analyzes transaction patterns for anomalies within governance constraints. Displays risk signals for human review.
FunctionalProvides relationship guidance based on constitutional principles. All advice subject to human judgment.
FunctionalVisualizes constitutional rule application and evidence chains. Demonstrates transparent AI governance.
FunctionalDisplays Canon registry entries with cryptographic verification. Evidence-by-design demonstration.
FunctionalDemonstrates system boundary monitoring and trace aggregation across constitutional boundaries.
Will demonstrate real-time authority chain validation and AC-1 override mechanisms.
Will provide searchable access to all Canon evidence with cryptographic verification.
Will display real-time system relationships, status, and evidence flow across ETHRAEON infrastructure.
Will demonstrate how constitutional rules constrain AI behavior in real-time decision scenarios.
Will show GDPR/AI Act compliance status across all ETHRAEON systems with audit trails.
What makes these "Interfaces" and not "Systems"?